“Democratic Art is a welcome addition to the historical record of the new Deal. All of us who seek to uphold the values and principles of the New Deal and have them applied in our own time owe Musher a debt of gratitude for her lucid and thorough contribution to our understanding of the New Deal arts programs.”

Michael Ticktin | New Deal News

“Democratic Art creates a sort of New Deal art typology—and thus provides an excellent framework for analysis. And it may also motivate you to take a second, closer look at that post office mural.”

Brent McKee | Mid-Atlantic New Deal Newsletter

“Musher divides her discussion of government-sponsored art programs of the 1930s in the United States into five distinct modes of communication: grandeur, enrichment, weapon, experience, and subversion. This approach avoids the simplistic, politicized reading of the public art programs of the period that characterizes so much discussion of this material and will significantly impact future scholarship. There are two interesting outcomes of this format: style assumes a significant role in understanding how the varied messages of the projects within Musher’s categories were communicated, and context becomes much richer and more precisely situated within the social and political order for which the art was created. Musher does all this without invidious comparisons to ‘advanced American art,’ and thus gives the works she discusses their proper—and honorable—place within American history, as well as art history. Recommended.”

Choice

“This engagingly written account of New Deal arts funding quickly put to rest my concerns about whether we need yet another book about the New Deal art projects…. The thematic organization of the material and her excellent use of biographies and key examples make it a useful book for both students and experts in the field.”
 
“Warning of the political implications of using art as a weapon, and lamenting the purely economic justifications used by recent supporters of federal art funding, Musher argues that advocates should take a lesson from the 1930s art-as-experience activists who argued that, beyond creating jobs and stimulating the economy, the arts ‘make us more thoughtful, satisfied, and engaged citizens.’”

Victoria M. Grieve | Annals of Iowa

“Musher produces not so much new findings as an enriched sense of the forces at play, demonstrating the formative role of belief systems as much as economic conditions and deftly interweaving institutional histories, ideological dynamics, mini-biographies of administrators, and selected analyses of artworks.”

Christine Bold | American Historical Review

“While other scholars have studied the various New Deal art programs either individually or in broad surveys, in Democratic Art Musher works more conceptually as she seeks to articulate the various ways art’s public purposes were framed by those who advocated or rejected the idea that government should participate in funding the arts. The result is a valuable, engaging, narrative of New Deal arts programs that invites us to think about the argumentative resources potentially available to those who advocate for government-funded arts programs today. . . . Musher’s study is a welcome addition to the scholarly conversation and will be invaluable to those of us introducing students and colleagues to the role of government art in the New Deal.”

Cara A. Finnegan | Journal of American History