<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>University of Chicago Press: New Titles in Sociology: Individual, State and Society</title>
    <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/rss/books/RSS.xml</link>
    <description>The latest new books in Sociology: Individual, State and Society</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>These Kids</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo15357231.html</link>
      <description>Few would deny that getting ahead is a legitimate goal of learning, but the phrase implies a cruel hierarchy: a student does not simply get ahead, but gets ahead of others. In These Kids, Kysa Nygreen turns a critical eye on this paradox. Offering the voices and viewpoints of students at a “last chance” high school in California, she tells the story of students who have, in fact, been left behind.&amp;#160;Detailing a youth-led participatory action research project that she coordinated, Nygreen uncovers deep barriers to educational success that are embedded within educational discourse itself. Struggling students internalize descriptions of themselves as “at risk,” “low achieving,” or “troubled”—and by adopting the very language of educators, they also adopt its constraints and presumption of failure. Showing how current educational discourse does not, ultimately, provide an adequate vision of change for students at the bottom of the educational hierarchy, she levies a powerful argument that social justice in education is impossible today precisely because of how we talk about it.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;Few would deny that getting ahead is a legitimate goal of learning, but the phrase implies a cruel hierarchy: a student does not simply get ahead, but gets ahead of others. In &lt;i&gt;These Kids&lt;/i&gt;, Kysa Nygreen turns a critical eye on this paradox. Offering the voices and viewpoints of students at a &amp;ldquo;last chance&amp;rdquo; high school in California, she tells the story of students who have, in fact, been left behind.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Detailing a youth-led participatory action research project that she coordinated, Nygreen uncovers deep barriers to educational success that are embedded within educational discourse itself. Struggling students internalize descriptions of themselves as &amp;ldquo;at risk,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;low achieving,&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;troubled&amp;rdquo;&amp;mdash;and by adopting the very language of educators, they also adopt its constraints and presumption of failure. Showing how current educational discourse does not, ultimately, provide an adequate vision of change for students at the bottom of the educational hierarchy, she levies a powerful argument that social justice in education is impossible today precisely because of how we talk about it.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/03/9780226031569.jpeg" length="43146" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Education: Curriculum and Methodology</category>
      <category>Education: Pre-School, Elementary and Secondary Education</category>
      <category>Sociology: Individual, State and Society</category>
      <category>Sociology: Social Organization--Stratification, Mobility</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Kysa Nygreen</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226031422</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Symbolic Power, Politics, and Intellectuals</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo14365337.html</link>
      <description>Power is the central organizing principle of all social life, from  culture and education to stratification and taste. And there is no more  prominent name in the analysis of power than that of noted sociologist  Pierre Bourdieu. Throughout his career, Bourdieu challenged the commonly  held view that symbolic power—the power to dominate—is solely symbolic.  He emphasized that symbolic power helps create and maintain social  hierarchies, which form the very bedrock of political life. By the time  of his death in 2002, Bourdieu had become a leading public intellectual,  and his argument about the more subtle and influential ways that  cultural resources and symbolic categories prevail in power arrangements  and practices had gained broad recognition.In Symbolic Power, Politics, and Intellectuals,  David L. Swartz delves deeply into Bourdieu’s work to show how  central—but often overlooked—power and politics are to an understanding  of sociology. Arguing that power and politics stand at the core of  Bourdieu’s sociology, Swartz illuminates Bourdieu’s political project  for the social sciences, as well as Bourdieu’s own political activism,  explaining how sociology is not just science but also a crucial form of  political engagement.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;Power is the central organizing principle of all social life, from  culture and education to stratification and taste. And there is no more  prominent name in the analysis of power than that of noted sociologist  Pierre Bourdieu. Throughout his career, Bourdieu challenged the commonly  held view that symbolic power&amp;mdash;the power to dominate&amp;mdash;is solely symbolic.  He emphasized that symbolic power helps create and maintain social  hierarchies, which form the very bedrock of political life. By the time  of his death in 2002, Bourdieu had become a leading public intellectual,  and his argument about the more subtle and influential ways that  cultural resources and symbolic categories prevail in power arrangements  and practices had gained broad recognition.&lt;/div&gt;In &lt;i&gt;Symbolic Power, Politics, and Intellectuals&lt;/i&gt;,  David L. Swartz delves deeply into Bourdieu&amp;rsquo;s work to show how  central&amp;mdash;but often overlooked&amp;mdash;power and politics are to an understanding  of sociology. Arguing that power and politics stand at the core of  Bourdieu&amp;rsquo;s sociology, Swartz illuminates Bourdieu&amp;rsquo;s political project  for the social sciences, as well as Bourdieu&amp;rsquo;s own political activism,  explaining how sociology is not just science but also a crucial form of  political engagement.&lt;br&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/92/9780226925011.jpeg" length="21602" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Political Science: Political and Social Theory</category>
      <category>Sociology: General Sociology</category>
      <category>Sociology: Individual, State and Society</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>David L. Swartz</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226925004</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Education, Justice, and Democracy</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo14821526.html</link>
      <description>Education is a contested topic, and not just politically. For years scholars have approached it from two different points of view: one empirical, focused on explanations for student and school success and failure, and the other philosophical, focused on education’s value and purpose within the larger society. Rarely have these separate approaches been brought into the same conversation. Education, Justice, and Democracy does just that, offering an intensive discussion by highly respected scholars across empirical and philosophical disciplines.&amp;#160;The contributors explore how the institutions and practices of education can support democracy, by creating the conditions for equal citizenship and egalitarian empowerment, and how they can advance justice, by securing social mobility and cultivating the talents and interests of every individual. Then the authors evaluate constraints on achieving the goals of democracy and justice in the educational arena and identify strategies that we can employ to work through or around those constraints. More than a thorough compendium on a timely and contested topic, Education, Justice, and Democracy exhibits an entirely new, more deeply composed way of thinking about education as a whole and its importance to a good society.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;Education is a contested topic, and not just politically. For years scholars have approached it from two different points of view: one empirical, focused on explanations for student and school success and failure, and the other philosophical, focused on education&amp;rsquo;s value and purpose within the larger society. Rarely have these separate approaches been brought into the same conversation. &lt;i&gt;Education, Justice, and Democracy&lt;/i&gt; does just that, offering an intensive discussion by highly respected scholars across empirical and philosophical disciplines.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;The contributors explore how the institutions and practices of education can support democracy, by creating the conditions for equal citizenship and egalitarian empowerment, and how they can advance justice, by securing social mobility and cultivating the talents and interests of every individual. Then the authors evaluate constraints on achieving the goals of democracy and justice in the educational arena and identify strategies that we can employ to work through or around those constraints. More than a thorough compendium on a timely and contested topic, &lt;i&gt;Education, Justice, and Democracy&lt;/i&gt; exhibits an entirely new, more deeply composed way of thinking about education as a whole and its importance to a good society.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/01/9780226012766.jpeg" length="30610" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Education: Education--General Studies</category>
      <category>Education: Philosophy of Education</category>
      <category>Political Science: Political and Social Theory</category>
      <category>Sociology: Individual, State and Society</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Danielle S. Allen; Rob Reich</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226012629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
