<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>University of Chicago Press: New Titles in Rhetoric and Communication</title>
    <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/rss/books/RSS.xml</link>
    <description>The latest new books in Rhetoric and Communication</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Political Tone</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp.html</link>
      <description>It’s not what you say, but how you say it. Solving problems with  words is the essence of politics, and finding the right words for the  moment can make or break a politician’s career. Yet very little has been  said in political science about the elusive element of tone.In Political Tone,  Roderick P. Hart, Jay P. Childers, and Colene J. Lind analyze a range  of texts—from speeches and debates to advertising and print and  broadcast campaign coverage— using a sophisticated computer program,  DICTION, that parses their content for semantic features like realism,  commonality, and certainty, as well as references to religion, party, or  patriotic terms. Beginning with a look at how societal forces like  diversity and modernity manifest themselves as political tones in the  contexts of particular leaders and events, the authors proceed to  consider how individual leaders have used tone to convey their messages:  How did Bill Clinton’s clever dexterity help him recover from the  Monica Lewinsky scandal? How did Barack Obama draw on his experience as a  talented community activist to overcome his inexperience as a national  leader? And how does Sarah Palin’s wandering tone indicate that she  trusts her listeners and is open to their ideas?By focusing not on the substance of political arguments but on how they were phrased, Political Tone provides powerful and unexpected insights into American politics.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s not what you say, but how you say it. Solving problems with  words is the essence of politics, and finding the right words for the  moment can make or break a politician&amp;rsquo;s career. Yet very little has been  said in political science about the elusive element of tone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;In &lt;i&gt;Political Tone&lt;/i&gt;,  Roderick P. Hart, Jay P. Childers, and Colene J. Lind analyze a range  of texts&amp;mdash;from speeches and debates to advertising and print and  broadcast campaign coverage&amp;mdash; using a sophisticated computer program,  DICTION, that parses their content for semantic features like realism,  commonality, and certainty, as well as references to religion, party, or  patriotic terms. Beginning with a look at how societal forces like  diversity and modernity manifest themselves as political tones in the  contexts of particular leaders and events, the authors proceed to  consider how individual leaders have used tone to convey their messages:  How did Bill Clinton&amp;rsquo;s clever dexterity help him recover from the  Monica Lewinsky scandal? How did Barack Obama draw on his experience as a  talented community activist to overcome his inexperience as a national  leader? And how does Sarah Palin&amp;rsquo;s wandering tone indicate that she  trusts her listeners and is open to their ideas?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;By focusing not on the substance of political arguments but on how they were phrased, &lt;i&gt;Political Tone &lt;/i&gt;provides powerful and unexpected insights into American politics.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/02/9780226023151.jpeg" length="45015" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Media Studies</category>
      <category>Rhetoric and Communication</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Roderick P. Hart; Jay P. Childers; Colene J. Lind</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226023151</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, Eighth Edition</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp.html</link>
      <description>A little more than seventy-five years ago, Kate L. Turabian drafted a set of guidelines to help students understand how to write, cite, and formally submit research writing. Seven editions and more than nine million copies later, the name Turabian has become synonymous with best practices in research writing and style. Her Manual for Writers continues to be the gold standard for generations of college and graduate students in virtually all academic disciplines. Now in its eighth edition, A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations has been fully revised to meet the needs of today&amp;#8217;s writers and researchers.The Manual retains its familiar three-part structure, beginning with an overview of the steps in the research and writing process, including formulating questions, reading critically, building arguments, and revising drafts. Part II provides an overview of citation practices with detailed information on the two main scholarly citation styles (notes-bibliography and author-date), an array of source types with contemporary examples, and detailed guidance on citing online resources.The final section treats all matters of editorial style, with advice on punctuation, capitalization, spelling, abbreviations, table formatting, and the use of quotations. Style and citation recommendations have been revised throughout to reflect the sixteenth edition of The Chicago Manual of Style. With an appendix on paper format and submission that has been vetted by dissertation officials from across the country and a bibliography with the most up-to-date listing of critical resources available, A Manual for Writers remains the essential resource for students and their teachers.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;A little more than seventy-five years ago, Kate L. Turabian drafted a set of guidelines to help students understand how to write, cite, and formally submit research writing. Seven editions and more than nine million copies later, the name Turabian has become synonymous with best practices in research writing and style. Her &lt;i&gt;Manual for Writers&lt;/i&gt; continues to be the gold standard for generations of college and graduate students in virtually all academic disciplines. Now in its eighth edition, &lt;i&gt;A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations&lt;/i&gt; has been fully revised to meet the needs of today&amp;#8217;s writers and researchers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Manual&lt;/i&gt; retains its familiar three-part structure, beginning with an overview of the steps in the research and writing process, including formulating questions, reading critically, building arguments, and revising drafts. Part II provides an overview of citation practices with detailed information on the two main scholarly citation styles (notes-bibliography and author-date), an array of source types with contemporary examples, and detailed guidance on citing online resources.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The final section treats all matters of editorial style, with advice on punctuation, capitalization, spelling, abbreviations, table formatting, and the use of quotations. Style and citation recommendations have been revised throughout to reflect the sixteenth edition of &lt;i&gt;The Chicago Manual of Style&lt;/i&gt;. With an appendix on paper format and submission that has been vetted by dissertation officials from across the country and a bibliography with the most up-to-date listing of critical resources available, &lt;i&gt;A Manual for Writers&lt;/i&gt; remains the essential resource for students and their teachers.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/81/9780226816371.jpeg" length="51404" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Language and Linguistics: Language--Reference</category>
      <category>Reference and Bibliography</category>
      <category>Rhetoric and Communication</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Kate L. Turabian; Wayne C. Booth; Gregory G. Colomb; Joseph M. Williams; University of Chicago Press Staff</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226816371</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deep Rhetoric</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp.html</link>
      <description>“Rhetoric is the counterpart of logic,” claimed Aristotle.  “Rhetoric is the first part of logic rightly understood,” Martin  Heidegger concurred. “Rhetoric is the universal form of human  communication,” opined Hans-Georg Gadamer. But in Deep Rhetoric,  James Crosswhite offers a groundbreaking new conception of rhetoric, one  that builds a definitive case for an understanding of the discipline as  a philosophical enterprise beyond basic argumentation and is fully  conversant with the advances of the New Rhetoric of Cha&amp;iuml;m Perelman and  Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.Chapter by chapter, Deep Rhetoric  develops an understanding of rhetoric not only in its philosophical  dimension but also as a means of guiding and conducting conflicts,  achieving justice, and understanding the human condition. Along the way,  Crosswhite restores the traditional dignity and importance of the  discipline and illuminates the twentieth-century resurgence of rhetoric  among philosophers, as well as the role that rhetoric can play in future  discussions of ontology, epistemology, and ethics. At a time when the  fields of philosophy and rhetoric have diverged, Crosswhite returns them  to their common moorings and shows us an invigorating new way forward.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;&amp;ldquo;Rhetoric is the counterpart of logic,&amp;rdquo; claimed Aristotle.  &amp;ldquo;Rhetoric is the first part of logic rightly understood,&amp;rdquo; Martin  Heidegger concurred. &amp;ldquo;Rhetoric is the universal form of human  communication,&amp;rdquo; opined Hans-Georg Gadamer. But in &lt;i&gt;Deep Rhetoric&lt;/i&gt;,  James Crosswhite offers a groundbreaking new conception of rhetoric, one  that builds a definitive case for an understanding of the discipline as  a philosophical enterprise beyond basic argumentation and is fully  conversant with the advances of the New Rhetoric of Cha&amp;iuml;m Perelman and  Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chapter by chapter, &lt;i&gt;Deep Rhetoric&lt;/i&gt;  develops an understanding of rhetoric not only in its philosophical  dimension but also as a means of guiding and conducting conflicts,  achieving justice, and understanding the human condition. Along the way,  Crosswhite restores the traditional dignity and importance of the  discipline and illuminates the twentieth-century resurgence of rhetoric  among philosophers, as well as the role that rhetoric can play in future  discussions of ontology, epistemology, and ethics. At a time when the  fields of philosophy and rhetoric have diverged, Crosswhite returns them  to their common moorings and shows us an invigorating new way forward.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/01/9780226016481.jpeg" length="19907" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Rhetoric and Communication</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Crosswhite</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226016481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
