<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>University of Chicago Press: New Titles in Political Science: Political and Social Theory</title>
    <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/rss/books/su48_6RSS.xml</link>
    <description>The latest new books in Political Science: Political and Social Theory</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Terrorism, Ticking Time-Bombs, and Torture</title>
      <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo12274697.html</link>
      <description>The general consensus among philosophers is that the use of torture is never justified. In Terrorism, Ticking Time-Bombs, and Torture, Fritz Allhoff demonstrates the weakness of the case against torture; while allowing that torture constitutes a moral wrong, he nevertheless argues that, in exceptional cases, it represents the lesser of two evils.&amp;#160;Allhoff does not take this position lightly. He begins by examining the way terrorism challenges traditional norms, discussing the morality of various practices of torture, and critically exploring the infamous ticking time-bomb scenario. After carefully considering these issues from a purely philosophical perspective, he turns to the empirical ramifications of his arguments, addressing criticisms of torture and analyzing the impact its adoption could have on democracy, institutional structures, and foreign policy. The crucial questions of how to justly authorize torture and how to set limits on its use make up the final section of this timely, provocative, and carefully argued book.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;The general consensus among philosophers is that the use of torture is never justified. In &lt;i&gt;Terrorism, Ticking Time-Bombs, and Torture&lt;/i&gt;, Fritz Allhoff demonstrates the weakness of the case against torture; while allowing that torture constitutes a moral wrong, he nevertheless argues that, in exceptional cases, it represents the lesser of two evils.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Allhoff does not take this position lightly. He begins by examining the way terrorism challenges traditional norms, discussing the morality of various practices of torture, and critically exploring the infamous ticking time-bomb scenario. After carefully considering these issues from a purely philosophical perspective, he turns to the empirical ramifications of his arguments, addressing criticisms of torture and analyzing the impact its adoption could have on democracy, institutional structures, and foreign policy. The crucial questions of how to justly authorize torture and how to set limits on its use make up the final section of this timely, provocative, and carefully argued book.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/01/9780226014838.jpeg" length="41641" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Philosophy: Ethics</category>
      <category>Philosophy: General Philosophy</category>
      <category>Political Science: Political and Social Theory</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Fritz Allhoff</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226014838</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Heidegger, Strauss, and the Premises of Philosophy</title>
      <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo11913243.html</link>
      <description>In this groundbreaking work, Richard L. Velkley examines the complex philosophical relationship between Martin Heidegger and Leo Strauss. Velkley argues that both thinkers provide searching analyses of the philosophical tradition&amp;#8217;s origins in radical questioning. For Heidegger and Strauss, the recovery of the original premises of philosophy cannot be separated from rethinking the very possibility of genuine philosophizing.&amp;#160;Common views of the influence of Heidegger&amp;#8217;s thought on Strauss suggest that, after being inspired early on by Heidegger&amp;#8217;s dismantling of the philosophical tradition, Strauss took a wholly separate path, spurning modernity and pursuing instead a renewal of Socratic political philosophy. Velkley rejects this reading and maintains that Strauss&amp;#8217;s engagement with the challenges posed by Heidegger&amp;#8212;as well as by modern philosophy in general&amp;#8212;formed a crucial and enduring framework for his lifelong philosophical project. More than an intellectual biography or a mere charting of influence, Heidegger, Strauss, and the Premises of Philosophy is a profound consideration of these two philosophers&amp;#8217; reflections on the roots, meaning, and fate of Western rationalism.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;In this groundbreaking work, Richard L. Velkley examines the complex philosophical relationship between Martin Heidegger and Leo Strauss. Velkley argues that both thinkers provide searching analyses of the philosophical tradition&amp;#8217;s origins in radical questioning. For Heidegger and Strauss, the recovery of the original premises of philosophy cannot be separated from rethinking the very possibility of genuine philosophizing.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Common views of the influence of Heidegger&amp;#8217;s thought on Strauss suggest that, after being inspired early on by Heidegger&amp;#8217;s dismantling of the philosophical tradition, Strauss took a wholly separate path, spurning modernity and pursuing instead a renewal of Socratic political philosophy. Velkley rejects this reading and maintains that Strauss&amp;#8217;s engagement with the challenges posed by Heidegger&amp;#8212;as well as by modern philosophy in general&amp;#8212;formed a crucial and enduring framework for his lifelong philosophical project. More than an intellectual biography or a mere charting of influence, &lt;i&gt;Heidegger, Strauss, and the Premises of Philosophy&lt;/i&gt; is a profound consideration of these two philosophers&amp;#8217; reflections on the roots, meaning, and fate of Western rationalism.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/85/9780226852546.jpeg" length="21543" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Philosophy: General Philosophy</category>
      <category>Philosophy: History and Classic Works</category>
      <category>Political Science: Political and Social Theory</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Richard L. Velkley</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226852546</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Totalitarian Experience</title>
      <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/T/bo12359635.html</link>
      <description>The fall of the Berlin Wall marked the beginning of the collapse of  the Soviet Union, as well as many other communist totalitarian regimes  around the world.&amp;#160;But it would be naive to assume that this historic,  symbolic event and its aftermath have completely rid the world of  totalitarianism. Instead, we should ask, what is the totalitarian  experience and how does it survive today?&amp;#160;This is the imposing question raised by acclaimed philosopher and  writer Tzvetan Todorov in this compact, highly personal essay. Here, he  recounts his own experiences with totalitarianism in his native Bulgaria  and discusses the books he has written in the last twenty years that  were devoted to examining such regimes, such as Voices from the Gulag,  his influential analysis of Stalinist concentration camps.&amp;#160;Through this  retrospective investigation, Todorov offers a historical look at  communism. He brings together and distills his extensive oeuvre to  reveal the essence of totalitarian ideology, the characteristics of  daily life under communism, and the irony of democratic messianism.&amp;#160;Bringing his thoughts and insights up to the present, Todorov  explores how economic ultraliberalism may be considered just another  form of totalitarianism. And his conclusion leads us to ask ourselves  another challenging question: Are liberal democratic societies actually  totalitarian experiences in disguise?&amp;#160;&amp;#160;“In this honed, finely calibrated essay, Todorov refutes the  notion that good can be imposed by force. More efficient is to embody  one’s values and demonstrate their worth. . . . This is a concise and  eloquent defence of what makes us truly human.”—Age, on Torture and the War on Terror&amp;#160;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The fall of the Berlin Wall marked the beginning of the collapse of  the Soviet Union, as well as many other communist totalitarian regimes  around the world.&amp;#160;But it would be naive to assume that this historic,  symbolic event and its aftermath have completely rid the world of  totalitarianism. Instead, we should ask, what is the totalitarian  experience and how does it survive today?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is the imposing question raised by acclaimed philosopher and  writer Tzvetan Todorov in this compact, highly personal essay. Here, he  recounts his own experiences with totalitarianism in his native Bulgaria  and discusses the books he has written in the last twenty years that  were devoted to examining such regimes, such as &lt;i&gt;Voices from the Gulag&lt;/i&gt;,  his influential analysis of Stalinist concentration camps.&amp;#160;Through this  retrospective investigation, Todorov offers a historical look at  communism. He brings together and distills his extensive oeuvre to  reveal the essence of totalitarian ideology, the characteristics of  daily life under communism, and the irony of democratic messianism.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Bringing his thoughts and insights up to the present, Todorov  explores how economic ultraliberalism may be considered just another  form of totalitarianism. And his conclusion leads us to ask ourselves  another challenging question: Are liberal democratic societies actually  totalitarian experiences in disguise?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&amp;ldquo;In this honed, finely calibrated essay, Todorov refutes the  notion that good can be imposed by force. More efficient is to embody  one&amp;rsquo;s values and demonstrate their worth. . . . This is a concise and  eloquent defence of what makes us truly human.&amp;rdquo;&amp;mdash;&lt;i&gt;Age&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;, on Torture and the War on Terror&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/08/57/42/9780857420138.jpeg" length="598660" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Political Science: Political and Social Theory</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Tzvetan Todorov; Teresa Lavender Fagan</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780857420138</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brussels, the Gentle Monster</title>
      <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/B/bo12507194.html</link>
      <description>The inner workings of the European Union are as much a mystery to  those living within its confines as they are to those of us who reside  elsewhere. The Brussels bureaucracy that sets many of the EU’s policies  feels remote to its citizens, yet the influence of its decisions can  extend worldwide and throughout the global marketplace.&amp;#160;In this timely and insightful essay, Hans Magnus  Enzensberger blends reportage, argument, and analysis in order to make  sense of the EU’s present political and economic roles and examine the  EU’s origins and inherent contradictions. In Enzensberger’s view, Europe  is involved in a project without precedent—the first non-violent form  of post-democratic governance, which is trying to abolish the diversity  of Europe and impose a regime that is not accountable to its citizens.  Its often bizarre and arbitrary rules amount to a soft but relentless  guardianship, dictating how half a billion people should live their  lives regardless of their own political opinions and traditions.  Enzensberger here offers a strategy for approaching this modern  monster—at once gentle and giant, friend and foe.&amp;#160;Praise for Enzensberger&amp;#160;“How should one cope with Germany? Let’s ask Hans  Magnus Enzensberger. . . . One can only marvel at his permanent  alertness, his tone of cold enragement, the dimensions of his hunger for  experience, most of all however, one can only marvel at his sense of  important issues. For 50 years, time and again Enzensberger has posed  the right questions to German society. . . . No one should ever believe  Enzensberger is on his side. Whenever someone makes a clear distinction  between Good and Evil, Enzensberger will jump out of his cover and  shout: It’s not that simple.”—Florian Illies, Die Zeit</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The inner workings of the European Union are as much a mystery to  those living within its confines as they are to those of us who reside  elsewhere. The Brussels bureaucracy that sets many of the EU&amp;rsquo;s policies  feels remote to its citizens, yet the influence of its decisions can  extend worldwide and throughout the global marketplace.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;In this timely and insightful essay, Hans Magnus  Enzensberger blends reportage, argument, and analysis in order to make  sense of the EU&amp;rsquo;s present political and economic roles and examine the  EU&amp;rsquo;s origins and inherent contradictions. In Enzensberger&amp;rsquo;s view, Europe  is involved in a project without precedent&amp;mdash;the first non-violent form  of post-democratic governance, which is trying to abolish the diversity  of Europe and impose a regime that is not accountable to its citizens.  Its often bizarre and arbitrary rules amount to a soft but relentless  guardianship, dictating how half a billion people should live their  lives regardless of their own political opinions and traditions.  Enzensberger here offers a strategy for approaching this modern  monster&amp;mdash;at once gentle and giant, friend and foe.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Praise for Enzensberger&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;ldquo;How should one cope with Germany? Let&amp;rsquo;s ask Hans  Magnus Enzensberger. . . . One can only marvel at his permanent  alertness, his tone of cold enragement, the dimensions of his hunger for  experience, most of all however, one can only marvel at his sense of  important issues. For 50 years, time and again Enzensberger has posed  the right questions to German society. . . . No one should ever believe  Enzensberger is on his side. Whenever someone makes a clear distinction  between Good and Evil, Enzensberger will jump out of his cover and  shout: It&amp;rsquo;s not that simple.&amp;rdquo;&amp;mdash;Florian Illies, &lt;i&gt;Die Zeit&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/08/57/42/9780857420237.jpg" length="41046" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Political Science: Political and Social Theory</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Hans Magnus Enzensberger; Martin Chalmers</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780857420237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

