<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>University of Chicago Press: New Titles in Law and Legal Studies: General Legal Studies</title>
    <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/rss/books/RSS.xml</link>
    <description>The latest new books in Law and Legal Studies: General Legal Studies</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Restoring Justice</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/R/bo15507513.html</link>
      <description>In the wake of Watergate, Gerald Ford appointed eminent lawyer and scholar Edward H. Levi to the post of attorney general—and thus gave him the onerous task of restoring legitimacy to a discredited Department of Justice. Levi was famously fair-minded and free of political baggage, and his inspired addresses during this tumultuous time were critical to rebuilding national trust. They reassured a tense and troubled nation that the Department of Justice would act in accordance with the principles underlying its name, operating as a nonpartisan organization under the strict rule of law.  &amp;nbsp; For Restoring Justice, Jack Fuller has carefully chosen from among Levi’s speeches a selection that sets out the attorney general’s view of the considerable challenges he faced: restoring public confidence through discussion and acts of justice, combating the corrosive skepticism of the time, and ensuring that the executive branch would behave judicially. Also included are addresses and Congressional testimonies that speak to issues that were hotly debated at the time, including electronic surveillance, executive privilege, separation of powers, antitrust enforcement, and the guidelines governing the FBI—many of which remain relevant today. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;  Serving at an almost unprecedentedly difficult time, Levi was among the most admired attorney generals of the modern era. Published here for the first time, the speeches in Restoring Justice offer a superb sense of the man and his work. &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;In the wake of Watergate, Gerald Ford appointed eminent lawyer and scholar Edward H. Levi to the post of attorney general&amp;mdash;and thus gave him the onerous task of restoring legitimacy to a discredited Department of Justice. Levi was famously fair-minded and free of political baggage, and his inspired addresses during this tumultuous time were critical to rebuilding national trust. They reassured a tense and troubled nation that the Department of Justice would act in accordance with the principles underlying its name, operating as a nonpartisan organization under the strict rule of law. &lt;br /&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;For &lt;i&gt;Restoring Justice&lt;/i&gt;, Jack Fuller has carefully chosen from among Levi&amp;rsquo;s speeches a selection that sets out the attorney general&amp;rsquo;s view of the considerable challenges he faced: restoring public confidence through discussion and acts of justice, combating the corrosive skepticism of the time, and ensuring that the executive branch would behave judicially. Also included are addresses and Congressional testimonies that speak to issues that were hotly debated at the time, including electronic surveillance, executive privilege, separation of powers, antitrust enforcement, and the guidelines governing the FBI&amp;mdash;many of which remain relevant today. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt; Serving at an almost unprecedentedly difficult time, Levi was among the most admired attorney generals of the modern era. Published here for the first time, the speeches in &lt;i&gt;Restoring Justice&lt;/i&gt; offer a superb sense of the man and his work.&lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/04/9780226041315.jpeg" length="29761" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Law and Legal Studies: General Legal Studies</category>
      <category>Law and Legal Studies: Legal History</category>
      <category>Political Science: Judicial Politics</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Edward H. Levi; Jack Fuller; Larry Kramer</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226041315</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shakespeare and the Law</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo14365198.html</link>
      <description>William Shakespeare is inextricably linked with the law. Legal documents make up most of the records we have of his life, and trials, lawsuits, and legal terms permeate his plays. Gathering an extraordinary team of literary and legal scholars, philosophers, and even sitting judges, Shakespeare and the Law demonstrates that Shakespeare’s thinking about legal concepts and legal practice points to a deep and sometimes vexed engagement with the law’s technical workings, its underlying premises, and its social effects.&amp;#160;Shakespeare and the Law opens with three essays that provide useful frameworks for approaching the topic, offering perspectives on law and literature that emphasize both the continuities and contrasts between the two fields. In its second section, the book considers Shakespeare’s awareness of common law thinking and common law practice through examinations of Measure for Measure and Othello. Building and expanding on this question, the third part inquires into Shakespeare’s general attitudes toward legal systems. A judge and a former solicitor general rule on Shylock’s demand for enforcement of his odd contract; and two essays by literary scholars take contrasting views on whether Shakespeare could imagine a functioning legal system. The fourth section looks at how law enters into conversation with issues of politics and community, both in the plays and in our own world. The volume concludes with a freewheeling colloquy among Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, Judge Richard Posner, Martha C. Nussbaum, and Richard Strier that covers everything from the ghost in Hamlet to the nature of judicial discretion.&amp;#160;Celebrating the sometimes fractious intellectual energy produced by scholars and practitioners tackling the question of Shakespeare and the law, this collection is a resource and provocation for further thinking and ongoing discussion.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;William Shakespeare is inextricably linked with the law. Legal documents make up most of the records we have of his life, and trials, lawsuits, and legal terms permeate his plays. Gathering an extraordinary team of literary and legal scholars, philosophers, and even sitting judges, &lt;i&gt;Shakespeare and the Law&lt;/i&gt; demonstrates that Shakespeare&amp;rsquo;s thinking about legal concepts and legal practice points to a deep and sometimes vexed engagement with the law&amp;rsquo;s technical workings, its underlying premises, and its social effects.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Shakespeare and the Law &lt;/i&gt;opens with three essays that provide useful frameworks for approaching the topic, offering perspectives on law and literature that emphasize both the continuities and contrasts between the two fields. In its second section, the book considers Shakespeare&amp;rsquo;s awareness of common law thinking and common law practice through examinations of &lt;i&gt;Measure for Measure&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Othello&lt;/i&gt;. Building and expanding on this question, the third part inquires into Shakespeare&amp;rsquo;s general attitudes toward legal systems. A judge and a former solicitor general rule on Shylock&amp;rsquo;s demand for enforcement of his odd contract; and two essays by literary scholars take contrasting views on whether Shakespeare could imagine a functioning legal system. The fourth section looks at how law enters into conversation with issues of politics and community, both in the plays and in our own world. The volume concludes with a freewheeling colloquy among Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, Judge Richard Posner, Martha C. Nussbaum, and Richard Strier that covers everything from the ghost in &lt;i&gt;Hamlet&lt;/i&gt; to the nature of judicial discretion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Celebrating the sometimes fractious intellectual energy produced by scholars and practitioners tackling the question of Shakespeare and the law, this collection is a resource and provocation for further thinking and ongoing discussion.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/92/9780226924939.jpeg" length="47876" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Law and Legal Studies: General Legal Studies</category>
      <category>Literature and Literary Criticism: British and Irish Literature</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Bradin Cormack; Martha C. Nussbaum; Richard Strier</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226924939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
