<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>University of Chicago Press: New Titles in History: History of Ideas</title>
    <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/rss/books/RSS.xml</link>
    <description>The latest new books in History: History of Ideas</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Political Arithmetic</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp.html</link>
      <description>We take for granted today that the assessments, measurements, and forecasts of economists are crucial to the decision-making of governments and businesses alike. But less than a century ago that wasn’t the case—economists simply didn’t have the necessary information or statistical tools to understand the ever more complicated modern economy. With Political Arithmetic, Nobel Prize–winning economist Robert Fogel and his collaborators tell the story of economist Simon Kuznets, the founding of the National Bureau of Economic Research, and the creation of the concept of GNP, which for the first time enabled us to measure the performance of entire economies. The book weaves together the many strands of political and economic thought and historical pressures that together created the demand for more detailed economic thinking—Progressive-era hopes for activist government, the production demands of World War I, Herbert Hoover’s interest in business cycles as President Harding’s commerce secretary, and the catastrophic economic failures of the Great Depression—and shows how, through trial and error, measurement and analysis, economists such as Kuznets rose to the occasion and in the process built a discipline whose knowledge could be put to practical use in everyday decision-making. The product of a lifetime of studying the workings of economies and skillfully employing the tools of economics, Political Arithmetic is simultaneously a history of a key period of economic thought and a testament to the power of applied ideas.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;We take for granted today that the assessments, measurements, and forecasts of economists are crucial to the decision-making of governments and businesses alike. But less than a century ago that wasn&amp;rsquo;t the case&amp;mdash;economists simply didn&amp;rsquo;t have the necessary information or statistical tools to understand the ever more complicated modern economy. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;With &lt;i&gt;Political Arithmetic&lt;/i&gt;, Nobel Prize&amp;ndash;winning economist Robert Fogel and his collaborators tell the story of economist Simon Kuznets, the founding of the National Bureau of Economic Research, and the creation of the concept of GNP, which for the first time enabled us to measure the performance of entire economies. The book weaves together the many strands of political and economic thought and historical pressures that together created the demand for more detailed economic thinking&amp;mdash;Progressive-era hopes for activist government, the production demands of World War I, Herbert Hoover&amp;rsquo;s interest in business cycles as President Harding&amp;rsquo;s commerce secretary, and the catastrophic economic failures of the Great Depression&amp;mdash;and shows how, through trial and error, measurement and analysis, economists such as Kuznets rose to the occasion and in the process built a discipline whose knowledge could be put to practical use in everyday decision-making. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;The product of a lifetime of studying the workings of economies and skillfully employing the tools of economics, &lt;i&gt;Political Arithmetic&lt;/i&gt; is simultaneously a history of a key period of economic thought and a testament to the power of applied ideas.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/25/9780226256610.jpeg" length="42798" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Economics and Business: Economics--Development, Growth, Planning</category>
      <category>Economics and Business: Economics--History</category>
      <category>History: History of Ideas</category>
      <category>Political Science: Comparative Politics</category>
      <category>Sociology: General Sociology</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Robert William Fogel; Enid M. Fogel; Mark Guglielmo; Nathaniel Grotte</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226256610</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Curiosity</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp.html</link>
      <description>With the recent landing of the Mars rover Curiosity, it seems safe to assume that the idea of being curious is alive and well in modern science—that it’s not merely encouraged but is seen as an essential component of the scientific mission. Yet there was a time when curiosity was condemned. Neither Pandora nor Eve could resist the dangerous allure of unanswered questions, and all knowledge wasn’t equal—for millennia it was believed that there were some things we should not try to know. In the late sixteenth century this attitude began to change dramatically, and in Curiosity: How Science Became Interested in Everything, Philip Ball investigates how curiosity first became sanctioned—when it changed from a vice to a virtue and how it became permissible to ask any and every question about the world.&amp;#160;Looking closely at the sixteenth through eighteenth centuries, Ball vividly brings to life the age when modern science began, a time that spans the lives of Galileo and Isaac Newton. In this entertaining and illuminating account of the rise of science as we know it, Ball tells of scientists both legendary and lesser known, from Copernicus and Kepler to Robert Boyle, as well as the inventions and technologies that were inspired by curiosity itself, such as the telescope and the microscope. The so-called Scientific Revolution is often told as a story of great geniuses illuminating the world with flashes of inspiration. But Curiosity reveals a more complex story, in which the liberation—and subsequent taming—of curiosity was linked to magic, religion, literature, travel, trade, and empire. Ball also asks what has become of curiosity today: how it functions in science, how it is spun and packaged for consumption, how well it is being sustained, and how the changing shape of science influences the kinds of questions it may continue to ask.&amp;#160;Though proverbial wisdom tell us that it was through curiosity that our innocence was lost, that has not deterred us. Instead, it has been completely the contrary: today we spend vast sums trying to reconstruct the first instants of creation in particle accelerators, out of a pure desire to know. Ball refuses to let us take this desire for granted, and this book is a perfect homage to such an inquisitive attitude.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;With the recent landing of the Mars rover Curiosity, it seems safe to assume that the idea of being curious is alive and well in modern science&amp;mdash;that it&amp;rsquo;s not merely encouraged but is seen as an essential component of the scientific mission. Yet there was a time when curiosity was condemned. Neither Pandora nor Eve could resist the dangerous allure of unanswered questions, and all knowledge wasn&amp;rsquo;t equal&amp;mdash;for millennia it was believed that there were some things we should not try to know. In the late sixteenth century this attitude began to change dramatically, and in &lt;i&gt;Curiosity: &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;How Science Became Interested in Everything, &lt;/i&gt;Philip Ball investigates how curiosity first became sanctioned&amp;mdash;when it changed from a vice to a virtue and how it became permissible to ask any and every question about the world.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Looking closely at the sixteenth through eighteenth centuries, Ball vividly brings to life the age when modern science began, a time that spans the lives of Galileo and Isaac Newton. In this entertaining and illuminating account of the rise of science as we know it, Ball tells of scientists both legendary and lesser known, from Copernicus and Kepler to Robert Boyle, as well as the inventions and technologies that were inspired by curiosity itself, such as the telescope and the microscope. The so-called Scientific Revolution is often told as a story of great geniuses illuminating the world with flashes of inspiration. But &lt;i&gt;Curiosity&lt;/i&gt; reveals a more complex story, in which the liberation&amp;mdash;and subsequent taming&amp;mdash;of curiosity was linked to magic, religion, literature, travel, trade, and empire. Ball also asks what has become of curiosity today: how it functions in science, how it is spun and packaged for consumption, how well it is being sustained, and how the changing shape of science influences the kinds of questions it may continue to ask.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Though proverbial wisdom tell us that it was through curiosity that our innocence was lost, that has not deterred us. Instead, it has been completely the contrary: today we spend vast sums trying to reconstruct the first instants of creation in particle accelerators, out of a pure desire to &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt;. Ball refuses to let us take this desire for granted, and this book is a perfect homage to such an inquisitive attitude.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/04/9780226045795.jpeg" length="58728" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>History: History of Ideas</category>
      <category>History: General History</category>
      <category>History: History of Technology</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <category>Physical Sciences: History and Philosophy of Physical Sciences</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Ball</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226045795</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Egyptian Oedipus</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp.html</link>
      <description>A contemporary of Descartes and Newton, Athanasius Kircher, S. J. (1601/2–80), was one of Europe’s most inventive and versatile scholars in the baroque era. He published more than thirty works in fields as diverse as astronomy, magnetism, cryptology, numerology, geology, and music. But Kircher is most famous—or infamous—for his quixotic attempt to decipher the Egyptian hieroglyphs and reconstruct the ancient traditions they encoded. In 1655, after more than two decades of toil, Kircher published his solution to the hieroglyphs, Oedipus Aegyptiacus, a work that has been called “one of the most learned monstrosities of all times.” Here Daniel Stolzenberg presents a new interpretation of Kircher’s hieroglyphic studies, placing them in the context of seventeenth-century scholarship on paganism and Oriental languages.&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; Situating Kircher in the social world of baroque Rome, with its scholars, artists, patrons, and censors, Stolzenberg shows how Kircher’s study of ancient paganism depended on the circulation of texts, artifacts, and people between Christian and Islamic civilizations. Along with other participants in the rise of Oriental studies, Kircher aimed to revolutionize the study of the past by mastering Near Eastern languages and recovering ancient manuscripts hidden away in the legendary libraries of Cairo and Damascus. The spectacular flaws of his scholarship have fostered an image of Kircher as an eccentric anachronism, a throwback to the Renaissance hermetic tradition. Stolzenberg argues against this view, showing how Kircher embodied essential tensions of a pivotal phase in European intellectual history, when pre-Enlightenment scholars pioneered modern empirical methods of studying the past while still working within traditional frameworks, such as biblical history and beliefs about magic and esoteric wisdom.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;A contemporary of Descartes and Newton, Athanasius Kircher, S. J. (1601/2&amp;ndash;80), was one of Europe&amp;rsquo;s most inventive and versatile scholars in the baroque era. He published more than thirty works in fields as diverse as astronomy, magnetism, cryptology, numerology, geology, and music. But Kircher is most famous&amp;mdash;or infamous&amp;mdash;for his quixotic attempt to decipher the Egyptian hieroglyphs and reconstruct the ancient traditions they encoded. In 1655, after more than two decades of toil, Kircher published his solution to the hieroglyphs, &lt;i&gt;Oedipus Aegyptiacus&lt;/i&gt;, a work that has been called &amp;ldquo;one of the most learned monstrosities of all times.&amp;rdquo; Here Daniel Stolzenberg presents a new interpretation of Kircher&amp;rsquo;s hieroglyphic studies, placing them in the context of seventeenth-century scholarship on paganism and Oriental languages.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Situating Kircher in the social world of baroque Rome, with its scholars, artists, patrons, and censors, Stolzenberg shows how Kircher&amp;rsquo;s study of ancient paganism depended on the circulation of texts, artifacts, and people between Christian and Islamic civilizations. Along with other participants in the rise of Oriental studies, Kircher aimed to revolutionize the study of the past by mastering Near Eastern languages and recovering ancient manuscripts hidden away in the legendary libraries of Cairo and Damascus. The spectacular flaws of his scholarship have fostered an image of Kircher as an eccentric anachronism, a throwback to the Renaissance hermetic tradition. Stolzenberg argues against this view, showing how Kircher embodied essential tensions of a pivotal phase in European intellectual history, when pre-Enlightenment scholars pioneered modern empirical methods of studying the past while still working within traditional frameworks, such as biblical history and beliefs about magic and esoteric wisdom.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/92/9780226924144.jpeg" length="33401" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>History: History of Ideas</category>
      <category>Religion: Comparative Studies and History of Religion</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Daniel Stolzenberg</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226924144</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Darwin Deleted</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp.html</link>
      <description>The ideas and terminology of Darwinism are so pervasive these days that it seems impossible to avoid them, let alone imagine a world without them. But in this remarkable rethinking of scientific history, Peter J. Bowler does just that. He asks:&amp;#160;What if Charles Darwin had not returned from the voyage of the Beagle and thus did not write On the Origin of Species? Would someone else, such as Alfred Russel Wallace, have published the selection theory and initiated a similar transformation? Or would the absence of Darwin’s book have led to a different sequence of events, in which biology developed along a track that did not precipitate a great debate about the impact of evolutionism? Would there have been anything equivalent to social Darwinism, and if so would the alternatives have been less pernicious and misappropriated?In Darwin Deleted, Bowler argues that no one else, not even Wallace, was in a position to duplicate Darwin’s complete theory of evolution by natural selection.&amp;#160;Evolutionary biology would almost certainly have emerged, but through alternative theories, which were frequently promoted by scientists, religious thinkers, and moralists who feared the implications of natural selection. Because non-Darwinian elements of evolutionism flourished for a time in the real world, it is possible to plausibly imagine how they might have developed, particularly if the theory of natural selection had not emerged until decades after the acceptance of the basic idea of evolution. Bowler’s unique approach enables him to clearly explain the non-Darwinian tradition—and in doing so, he reveals how the reception of Darwinism was historically contingent. By taking Darwin out of the equation, Bowler is able to fully elucidate the ideas of other scientists, such as Richard Owen and Thomas Huxley, whose work has often been misunderstood because of their distinctive responses to Darwin.Darwin Deleted boldly offers a new vision of scientific history. It is one where the sequence of discovery and development would have been very different and would have led to an alternative understanding of the relationship between evolution, heredity, and the environment—and, most significantly, a less contentious relationship between science and religion. Far from mere speculation, this fascinating and compelling book forces us to reexamine the preconceptions that underlie many of the current controversies about the impact of evolutionism. It shows how contingent circumstances surrounding the publication of On the Origin of Species polarized attitudes in ways that still shape the conversation today.&amp;#160;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;The ideas and terminology of Darwinism are so pervasive these days that it seems impossible to avoid them, let alone imagine a world without them. But in this remarkable rethinking of scientific history, Peter J. Bowler does just that. He asks:&amp;#160;What if Charles Darwin had not returned from the voyage of the &lt;i&gt;Beagle&lt;/i&gt; and thus did not write &lt;i&gt;On the Origin of Species&lt;/i&gt;? Would someone else, such as Alfred Russel Wallace, have published the selection theory and initiated a similar transformation? Or would the absence of Darwin&amp;rsquo;s book have led to a different sequence of events, in which biology developed along a track that did not precipitate a great debate about the impact of evolutionism? Would there have been anything equivalent to social Darwinism, and if so would the alternatives have been less pernicious and misappropriated?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;In&lt;i&gt; Darwin Deleted&lt;/i&gt;, Bowler argues that no one else, not even Wallace, was in a position to duplicate Darwin&amp;rsquo;s complete theory of evolution by natural selection.&amp;#160;Evolutionary biology would almost certainly have emerged, but through alternative theories, which were frequently promoted by scientists, religious thinkers, and moralists who feared the implications of natural selection. Because non-Darwinian elements of evolutionism flourished for a time in the real world, it is possible to plausibly imagine how they might have developed, particularly if the theory of natural selection had not emerged until decades after the acceptance of the basic idea of evolution. Bowler&amp;rsquo;s unique approach enables him to clearly explain the non-Darwinian tradition&amp;mdash;and in doing so, he reveals how the reception of Darwinism was historically contingent. By taking Darwin out of the equation, Bowler is able to fully elucidate the ideas of other scientists, such as Richard Owen and Thomas Huxley, whose work has often been misunderstood because of their distinctive responses to Darwin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Darwin Deleted&lt;/i&gt; boldly offers a new vision of scientific history. It is one where the sequence of discovery and development would have been very different and would have led to an alternative understanding of the relationship between evolution, heredity, and the environment&amp;mdash;and, most significantly, a less contentious relationship between science and religion. Far from mere speculation, this fascinating and compelling book forces us to reexamine the preconceptions that underlie many of the current controversies about the impact of evolutionism. It shows how contingent circumstances surrounding the publication of &lt;i&gt;On the Origin of Species&lt;/i&gt; polarized attitudes in ways that still shape the conversation today.&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/06/9780226068671.jpeg" length="17055" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Biological Sciences: Evolutionary Biology</category>
      <category>History: History of Ideas</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Peter J. Bowler</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226068671</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Baroque Science</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp.html</link>
      <description>In Baroque Science, Ofer Gal and Raz D. Chen-Morris present a radically new perspective on the study of early modern science. Instead of the triumph of reason and rationality and the celebration of the discoveries and breakthroughs of the period, they examine science in the context of the baroque, analyzing the tensions, paradoxes, and compromises that shaped the New Science of the seventeenth century and enabled its spectacular success.&amp;#160;Gal and Chen-Morris show how scientists during the seventeenth century turned away from the trust in the acquisition of knowledge through the senses towards a growing reliance on the mediation of artificial instruments, such as lenses and mirrors for observation and mechanical and pneumatic devices for experimentation. Likewise, the mathematical techniques and procedures that allowed the success of mathematical natural philosophy turned increasingly obscure and artificial, and in place of divine harmonies they revealed an assemblage of isolated, contingent laws and constants.&amp;#160;In its attempts to enforce order in the face of threatening chaos, blur the boundaries of the natural and the artificial, and mobilize passions in the service of objective knowledge, Gal and Chen-Morris reveal, the New Science is a baroque phenomenon.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;div&gt;In &lt;i&gt;Baroque Science&lt;/i&gt;, Ofer Gal and Raz D. Chen-Morris present a radically new perspective on the study of early modern science. Instead of the triumph of reason and rationality and the celebration of the discoveries and breakthroughs of the period, they examine science in the context of the baroque, analyzing the tensions, paradoxes, and compromises that shaped the New Science of the seventeenth century and enabled its spectacular success.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Gal and Chen-Morris show how scientists during the seventeenth century turned away from the trust in the acquisition of knowledge through the senses towards a growing reliance on the mediation of artificial instruments, such as lenses and mirrors for observation and mechanical and pneumatic devices for experimentation. Likewise, the mathematical techniques and procedures that allowed the success of mathematical natural philosophy turned increasingly obscure and artificial, and in place of divine harmonies they revealed an assemblage of isolated, contingent laws and constants.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;In its attempts to enforce order in the face of threatening chaos, blur the boundaries of the natural and the artificial, and mobilize passions in the service of objective knowledge, Gal and Chen-Morris reveal, the New Science is a baroque phenomenon.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/92/9780226923987.jpeg" length="37292" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Art: European Art</category>
      <category>History: History of Ideas</category>
      <category>Physical Sciences: History and Philosophy of Physical Sciences</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ofer Gal; Raz Chen-Morris</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226923987</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I Speak of the City</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp.html</link>
      <description>In  this dazzling multidisciplinary tour of Mexico City, Mauricio  Tenorio-Trillo focuses on the period 1880 to 1940, the decisive decades  that shaped the city into what it is today.&amp;#160;&amp;#160;Through a kaleidoscope of expository forms, I Speak of the City  connects the realms of literature, architecture, music, popular  language, art, and public health to investigate the city in a variety of  contexts: as a living history textbook, as an expression of the state,  as a modernist capital, as a laboratory, and as language. Tenorio’s  formal imagination allows the reader to revel in the free-flowing  richness of his narratives, opening startling new vistas onto the urban  experience.&amp;#160;From  art to city planning, from epidemiology to poetry, this book challenges  the conventional wisdom about both Mexico City and the  turn-of-the-century world to which it belonged.&amp;#160;And by engaging directly  with the rise of modernism and the cultural experiences of such  personalities as Hart Crane, Mina Loy, and Diego Rivera, I Speak of the City will find an enthusiastic audience across the disciplines.&amp;#160;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;In  this dazzling multidisciplinary tour of Mexico City, Mauricio  Tenorio-Trillo focuses on the period 1880 to 1940, the decisive decades  that shaped the city into what it is today.&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Through a kaleidoscope of expository forms, &lt;i&gt;I Speak of the City&lt;/i&gt;  connects the realms of literature, architecture, music, popular  language, art, and public health to investigate the city in a variety of  contexts: as a living history textbook, as an expression of the state,  as a modernist capital, as a laboratory, and as language. Tenorio&amp;rsquo;s  formal imagination allows the reader to revel in the free-flowing  richness of his narratives, opening startling new vistas onto the urban  experience.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;From  art to city planning, from epidemiology to poetry, this book challenges  the conventional wisdom about both Mexico City and the  turn-of-the-century world to which it belonged.&amp;#160;And by engaging directly  with the rise of modernism and the cultural experiences of such  personalities as Hart Crane, Mina Loy, and Diego Rivera, &lt;i&gt;I Speak of the City&lt;/i&gt; will find an enthusiastic audience across the disciplines.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/79/9780226792712.jpeg" length="19499" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Folklore and Mythology</category>
      <category>History: History of Ideas</category>
      <category>History: Latin American History</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Mauricio Tenorio-Trillo</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226792712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
