The Infanticide Controversy
Primatology and the Art of Field Science
Infanticide in the natural world might be a relatively rare event, but as Amanda Rees shows, it has enormously significant consequences. Identified in the 1960s as a phenomenon worthy of investigation, infanticide had, by the 1970s, become the focus of serious controversy. The suggestion, by Sarah Hrdy, that it might be the outcome of an evolved strategy intended to maximize an individual’s reproductive success sparked furious disputes between scientists, disagreements that have continued down to the present day.
Meticulously tracing the history of the infanticide debates, and drawing on extensive interviews with field scientists, Rees investigates key theoretical and methodological themes that have characterized field studies of apes and monkeys in the twentieth century. As a detailed study of the scientific method and its application to field research, The Infanticide Controversy sheds new light on our understanding of scientific practice, focusing in particular on the challenges of working in “natural” environments, the relationship between objectivity and interpretation in an observational science, and the impact of the public profile of primatology on the development of primatological research. Most importantly, it also considers the wider significance that the study of field science has in a period when the ecological results of uncontrolled human interventions in natural systems are becoming ever more evident.
“I have long thought that the infanticide controversy would provide a gold mine for historians of science, and Amanda Rees has mined it to the fullest. She not only provides an extraordinarily well-researched and insightful chronicle of the controversy and its roots, but in the process provides important insights into the ‘science wars’ as well as the most comprehensive available introduction to field primatology, its history, aspirations, limitations, and inherent fascination. Even with the background and the biases of a participant, I found the book studded with novel insights and in reading it gained a broader perspective on my own field of study. This is history of science at its best.”—Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, author of The Woman That Never Evolved and Mother Nature: A History of Mothers, Infants, and Natural Selection
“Amanda Rees provides us with a comprehensive yet sensitive history of one rather tortured debate in the history of primatology—shedding much-needed light on an aspect of science (namely, field-based research) that is very rarely considered in studies of the history of science.”— Robin Dunbar, University of Oxford
“This well-written and deeply considered book cleverly applies the insights of the sociology of science to primatology. Amanda Rees shows that there is a ‘fieldworker’s regress’ which creates unavoidable ambiguities in field-based observations. These combine with researchers’ ideas about humans’ relationship to primates, giving rise to irresolvable conflicts over what is going on when monkeys kill infants belonging to their group. The book engages the reader from page one and has the hallmark of a lasting resource, not only for analysts of science, but also for primatologists, and for fieldworkers of all kinds.”—Harry Collins, Cardiff University
“Why on earth would monkeys kill their babies? Primatologists want to know. On the other hand, Amanda Rees wants to know how field primatologists come to conclusions about it. In this brilliant analysis, she examines the history of a recent scientific controversy, using it as a lens by which to peer into the evolving epistemology of a young science. This is one of the most important recent books to come out of the field of science studies, and her analysis of the infanticide controversy will most likely outlive the controversy itself.”—Jon Marks, University of North Carolina–Charlotte
“The Infanticide Controversy is an authoritatively researched and attractively written work of historico-sociological analysis of important recent science. It draws on extensive interviews with participants and exhibits a deep knowledge of the technical issues as well as the multiple contexts conditioning debates about them.”—Gregory Radick, author of The Simian Tongue
Acknowledgments
Introduction: The Infanticide Controversy
Part 1: Fielding the Question
1 Primates in the Field: Doing Field Science, 1929-74
2 Studying Primate Societies, 1930-74
Part 2: The Infanticide Debates
3 Infanticide’s Infancy
4 From Controversy to Consensus? 1974-84
5 Controversy Resurgent
Part 3: Questioning the Field
6 Accounting for Infanticide, 2001-3
7 Controversy and Authority, Narrative and Testimony
Conclusion
Appendix: Infanticide Interviews, 2002-3
Notes
References
IndexAnthropology: Physical Anthropology
Biological Sciences: Behavioral Biology | Evolutionary Biology
You may purchase this title at these fine bookstores. Outside the USA, see our international sales information.





