Historical Knowledge, Historical Error

A Contemporary Guide to Practice

Allan Megill

Historical Knowledge, Historical Error
Bookmark and Share

Allan Megill

With contributions by Steven Shepard and Phillip Honenberger
304 pages | 3 tables | 6 x 9 | © 2007
Paper $27.50 ISBN: 9780226518305 Published February 2007

In the past thirty years, historians have broadened the scope of their discipline to include many previously neglected topics and perspectives. They have chronicled language, madness, gender, and sexuality and have experimented with new forms of presentation. They have turned to the histories of non-Western peoples and to the troubled relations between “the West” and the rest. Allan Megill welcomes these developments, but he also suggests that there is now confusion among historians about what counts as a justified account of the past.

In Historical Knowledge, Historical Error, Megill dispels some of the confusion. Here, he discusses issues of narrative, objectivity, and memory. He attacks what he sees as irresponsible uses of evidence while accepting the art of speculation, which incomplete evidence forces upon historians. Along the way, he offers succinct accounts of the epistemological road historians have traveled from Herodotus and Thucydides through Leopold von Ranke and Alexis de Tocqueville, and on to Hayden White, Natalie Zemon Davis, and Lynn Hunt.

Choice Magazine: CHOICE Outstanding Academic Title Awards
Won

View Recent Awards page for more award winning books.
Bruce Kuklick

Historical Knowledge, Historical Error is part of a resurgence of interest in the philosophy of history. Allan Megill knows his history and is more than usually sophisticated as a philosopher. He has useful and wise things to say on a host of topics including memory, counterfactuals, narrative, and professionalization. By no means do I agree with all that Megill has argued, but he is intelligent, clear, and displays a scholarly integrity that is rock-solid. The book deserves our extended attention.”--Bruce Kuklick, University of Pennsylvania

Dipesh Chakrabarty

“Megill’s book represents a major and much-needed intervention in the debates that have engaged historians and philosophers of history in the last two or three decades. Coming from someone who has thought deeply, carefully, and long on the meanings of historical objectivity for our times, this is a book that presents a fresh and clear point of view. Megill’s argument deserves attention from everybody who wonders about where the discipline of history might be headed once the dust has settled on the tired debates over objectivity versus relativist skepticism.”--Dipesh Chakrabarty, University of Chicago

 
Choice
"With this rigorous and lucid work, Megill has made a major contribution to the understanding of historical thought. . . . In brief, this is a work of exceptional value. Essential."
John L. Harvey | H-France
"The essays are to acquaint students with contemporary challenges of improper methodology or epistemology, to be overcome like the (more numerous) labors of Hercules."
Christopher Layne | Journal of American History
"This is a rewarding book. In ten essays, Allan Megill explores some of the most pressing challenges and worrisome pitfalls in modern historical practice. . . . These challenging and stimulating essays succeed well . . . in affirming that history works best when it is sharply distinguished from the present. Indeed, by remaining true to its core disciplinary methods and ideals, history can serve, Megill movingly concludes, 'as a model of honesty and intelligence in the investigation of the human world.'"
Raymond Grew | Journal of Interdisciplinary History
"Demanding intellectual rigor, Megill re-defines familiar terms and interjects his own firm opinions, leading readers along a circuitous path through the brambles of his own impressive learning. Readers can only trail along after this insightful and candid guide as he provocatively cites noted philosophers and historians, chastising them for solecisms. . . . To read his essays is like auditing a bracing seminar conducted by a stimulating, opinionated teacher."
John H. Zammito | Journal of Southern History
"This is an engaged book: it energetically attempts to provide 'a contemporary guide to practice,' to ward off historical error by the discriminating constitution of historical knowledge. At the heart of the book is Megill's long-standing engagement with the concept of 'objectivity,' and his effort to reconstitute the notion in terms of its many and nested significations."
Contents
Preface
Acknowledgments
Introduction: The Need for Historical Epistemology

Part I. Memory
            1. History with Memory, History without Memory
                Memory versus History
                History and the Present
                Conflicting Attitudes toward the Past 
                History’s Legitimate Roles
            2. History, Memory, Identity
                Identity and the Memory Wave
                Identity, Memory, and Historical Understanding 
                History, Memory, and the Unknown

Part II. Narrative and Knowledge
            3. Does Narrative Have a Cognitive Value of Its Own?
                The “Crisis” of Narrative
                The Epistemological Limits of Narrative
            4. Narrative and the Four Tasks of History-Writing 
                Explanation and Description
                Narrative and Braudel’s Mediterranean
                The Four Tasks of History-Writing

Part III. Objectivity and Speculation
            5. Objectivity for Historians
                Objectivity and Commitment
                Defining Objectivity
            6. A Case Study in Historical Epistemology: What Did the Neighbors Know about Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings?
                (by Steven Shepard, Phillip Honenberger, and Allan Megill)
                A Disputed Case
                Inference to the Best Explanation 
                Thagard’s Three Criteria
                A Fourth Criterion
                Inferring the Relationship
                The Case for Our Alternative Account
            7. Counterfactual History: On Niall Ferguson’s Virtual History and Similar Works

Part IV. Fragmentation
            8. Fragmentation and the Future of Historiography: On Peter Novick’s That Noble Dream
            9. “Grand Narrative” and the Discipline of History
                  Four Ideal-Typical Attitudes toward the Overall Coherence of History
                  Four Postulates Suggested by the Preceding Account
            10. Coherence and Incoherence in Historical Studies: From the Annales School to the New Cultural History
                 The Annales School and the Problem of Coherence
                 The Annales School: From Convergence to Multiplicity
                 Coherence as a Willed Commitment
                 Conclusion: Against Current Fashion

Notes
Index
For more information, or to order this book, please visit http://www.press.uchicago.edu
Google preview here

Chicago Manual of Style |

Chicago Blog: History

Events in History

Keep Informed

JOURNALs in History